Showing posts with label cancel culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cancel culture. Show all posts

Thursday, 3 February 2022

It's Not Always 'Cancel Culture'

 


In recent decades, we’ve seen a push towards political correctness. In some ways, I’m all for it. I don’t want to inadvertently use a term that is offensive to particular groups of people. However, it can sometimes be a minefield for writers. We want to be true to what we believe, and write about the things God has laid on our hearts, but what if those words result in a backlash from readers? Do we just put it down to spiritual attack and plough on, or could something else be going on?

There was a case last year where a Christian author won a prestigious award for best inspirational fiction. However, the award was rescinded a couple of days later after an outcry over her handling of a true historical event that was deeply wounding for First Nations people. Most of the criticism seemed to resolve around the fact that the ‘hero’ of the story was a white man who had taken part in atrocities (albeit unwittingly), but later found redemption. (I’ve chosen not to name the book or author here, as I wanted to make a more general point in this post about how we deal with such issues. However, if you want to find out specifics, there's a link to my review later in this post.)

All writers will receive negative feedback at times, whether that’s a rejection letter from a publisher, a sea of red ink from an editor, or a negative review on a public forum. Even some of our best-loved books have one- and two-star reviews on sites like Goodreads and Amazon. You’ll never please everyone, no matter how hard you try. If you’re expressing a Christian viewpoint in your book, there will also be people who will rate the book negatively just because it is a Christian book and they disagree with the content. But what do you do when the criticism goes beyond that and a book and its author are subject to vitriolic attacks from some sections of the community?

Reasons for Criticism

I think it’s important to recognise that such criticism can involve three different elements, though these are not mutually exclusive.

Spiritual Attack

If our writing contains Christian content, you can bet that the enemy won’t be happy about it. In Ephesians 6:12, we’re reminded that ‘our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms’. At some level, criticism aimed at Christian authors is inevitable. However, we have the assurance that Christ has overcome the powers of darkness (John 16:33; Colossians 2:15) and that if we’re serving the Lord, no attack against us will prevail (Isaiah 54:17).

Cancel Culture and Political Correctness

Criticism directed at an author may also be part of the ‘cancel culture’ phenomenon in which some people are ‘outed’, ostracised or boycotted due to comments they have made that are deemed offensive to some groups. At its extreme, this can result in Orwellian calls to rewrite history (including literature) so that it is more politically correct. At the least, it can result in authors receiving a barrage of complaints from those who dislike their views. The very nature of free speech is at issue here, though I do believe that with free speech comes responsibility, and that leads to the third point.

Valid Criticism

Spiritual attack may be directed at Christians who are trying to live out their calling. Naysayers with a ‘cancel culture’ mentality may abuse writers who don’t fit within their worldview. However, sometimes we get it wrong and the critics have a point. They may not always express it in a way we would like, especially if they have made personal attacks on the author. However, they may have identified something that the author has failed to adequately address.

What Can We Learn from This Case?

In the case I mentioned earlier, I think spiritual attack and some elements of ‘cancel culture’, at least in terms of political correctness, were involved. From the tone of some of the reviews, I suspect some of the critics had not read the book, or had only read the prologue, and were outraged at the very notion of the hero being involved in atrocities against indigenous people. Others had clearly read the book and were offended or hurt by content they regarded as harmful.

Having read the whole book myself, I think some of the critics have valid concerns. For me, it’s not the redemptive aspect that’s the problem. I believe anyone is a candidate for redemption, regardless of what they’ve done. The Apostle Paul called himself the worst of sinners (1 Timothy 1:15-16), yet he repented and became a true champion of the faith. The whole point of grace is that it is undeserved.

The problem with the book is that the author never really addresses the indigenous issues raised in the prologue. The hero regrets what he has done, but there is no engagement or involvement with First Nations people and what those events meant to them. Indeed, the only other mention of First Nations people is that Comanches killed the protagonist's parents. I understand that the focus of the book is the hero’s journey, but to position the hero within an actual historical event that is deeply wounding to indigenous people and then not address those issues is a grave omission in my opinion. Click here to see my full review.

The author did not deserve the vitriol she received from some quarters, and many Christians rallied behind her. Supporting each other is important, but when I look at the books’ ratings on Goodreads and Amazon, I see that my views are in the minority. Ninety-two percent of reviewers on Amazon gave the book 4- or 5-star ratings (mostly 5-star) and 84% of reviewers on Goodreads gave the book 4- and 5-star ratings. A lot of people clearly loved the book, and they are certainly entitled to their opinions. We all have different tastes and reading preferences. However, I suspect some may have given a good rating because they wanted to support the author. Indeed, one Goodreads reviewer said that she hadn’t read the book yet, but she’d given it five stars because she knew she’d love it. Ten points to that reviewer for wanting to be supportive, but zero points for the way she went about it. By all means, send the author a letter, email or private message; comment on her blog posts and social media posts. But don’t give a 5-star review to a book you haven’t even read. To do so, fails to acknowledge that there are lessons to be learned and that the critics may have raised points that we need to consider.

None of us is perfect. We’ll make mistakes, and God is there to forgive us and comfort us when we do. However, if we don’t learn from those mistakes, we do our readers and God’s message a great disservice. If we want to truly be salt and light in this world, we need to be humble and teachable, admit when we’ve got it wrong, then pick ourselves up and try to do better next time, with God’s help.

Are we going to reinforce unwarranted stereotypes or are we going to help break them down? I’d love to hear your views on this hot potato.

Author Bio


Nola Lorraine (aka Nola Passmore) has a passion for faith and social justice issues, and loves weaving words that inspire others with courage and hope. Her inspirational historical novel Scattered was published in 2020, and she has also co-edited the Christian charity anthology Glimpses of Light with Jeanette O’Hagan. She has more than 150 short publications, including fiction, poetry, devotions, true stories, magazine articles and academic papers. She and her husband Tim also run a freelance writing and editing business, The Write Flourish, from the home they share with their two adorable cavoodles in southeast Queensland, Australia. She’d love to connect with you through her website: www.nolalorraine.com.au

 

Photo Credit

Featured photo by Markus Winkler on Pixabay.


Monday, 13 July 2020

Woke or Awake? by Ruth Bonetti

Articulate wordsmiths beware!

Fellow writers do you quake in the new religion of righteous cancel culture? 
No book, statue or film is safe, even if it depicts those who fought against injustices like slave trading. 

The new religion of righteous cancel culture revolution insists "citizens who may have committed no crime and oppressed no one, feel obliged to get down on their knees in a gesture of supplication to persons unspecified." Thus Peter Baldwin sums up The race to tear down reason in The Weekend Australian  "The rise of a new cultural revelation threatens to destroy history itself."

History reveals disturbing parallels; the fall of the Roman Empire into Dark Ages; last century’s Nazi book-burning; writers, artists, intellectuals, linguists, decimated by Stalin and Mao. Today they are cancelled. In this hyper sensitive age do others feel uneasy, stifled, neutered? 

Johann Sebastian Bach: His Life In Pictures And Documents: Fischer ...Dead white males – of merit

"The evil that men do lives after them; the good is often interred with their bones." (Shakespeare) 
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." (George Santayana.)

Censored?

What place in academia that chooses Confucious Institutes over Ramsay?
What place in my next manuscript for a "racist" 1959 letter quotation? 

My landlord grandfather checked a house rented to "an ants’ nest Chinese Den…Chinese heads bobbed up everywhere in every door…I don’t know whether you can complain about them or say anything nasty about them. If you did it with your eyes open we cannot blame them.” 

In 1903 he worked with Hindus "and in a friendly way I asked one how it is they can live in such an awful smell. He just shook his head and said, our smell is not as bad as your smell is to our countrymen…I think this should be our first starting point without casting any judgment." Edit out?

How can we shine light in this new Dark Age?

Awake, calls the voice to us of the watchmen high up in the tower;
Midnight the hour is named; they call to us with bright voices;
where are you, wise virgins?
Indeed, the Bridegroom comes;
rise up and take your lamps,
Alleluia! 


Johan Sebastian Bach told of the wise virgins in his cantata Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme. 

I wait with burning oil.
Zion hears the watchmen sing,
her heart leaps for joy within her,
she wakens and hastily arises...

Bach faced criticism, rejection – as we do

"The music is too showy. Some of our members even think it is sinful. Music should be simple so that it draws attention to God, not to the music or the performers."
Imagine Bach drawing a deep breath before defending his music:
"The main purpose of my music is to glorify God. Some people do this with music that is simple. I haven't chosen to use a simple style, but my music comes from my heart as a humble offering to God. This honours God no matter what musical style I use."
"I play the notes but it is God who makes the music."
Rejected by ecclesiastical employers, Bach's secular one gave him the freedom to write as he was inspired. After Bach died in 1750, his "fuddy-duddy" (white male?) music was forgotten for 80 years. In 1829, another God-driven composer Felix Mendelssohn revived his St. Matthew Passion. 

Cure Writers' Block

Bach wrote prayers at the beginning and end of his manuscripts: at the top JJ, an abbreviation for “Jesu Juva,” which translated means, "Jesus, help me."
Then the music began to pour from his soul and onto the page. When he was finished and satisfied, he wrote the letters SDG at the bottom of the page - Soli Deo Gloria - For the Glory of God Alone.


RUTH BONETTI is grateful for Bach's example as she writes Part 3 of her award-winning Midnight Sun to Southern Cross saga, St Lucia and the Art Deco Mansion–What drove the man who built it? Due for October release, it tells further Journeys of her Grandfather.